'pedia

"Wired", unlike the 'pedia, is run for profit and has a group of managers dedicated to that idea. The 'pedia has a group of managers dedicated to the idea that experts are unneeded and that truth can be reached through populism. The Open Source movement has glommed onto the 'pedia as well and donates cash to them whenever the 'pedia runs short.

Source: wiktionary

While randomly searching Wikipedia and its sister projects, I noticed that, while Wikipedia itself has a moderate amount of information on Commodore computers, expansions, drives and such, its side-sites such as Wikibooks contain little that would be helpful to people new to the C= universe. The links on the 'pedia itself are numerous, however, most of them refer to sites that are game-related, which doesn't quite do the systems justice.

Source: wiktionary

The big problem, is that students (and other inquisitive minds) are also generally too lazy to find a library or other printed reference materials as sources, so they sit behind their computers and take the easy way out... believing that what they read in 'the 'pedia' is the truth.

Source: wiktionary

Only the art dealers care if he occupies any space in popular imagination. Does the 'pedia have pictures of Basso's sister? No, that shit sells itself. Here is something that occupies much more space. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_schema_of_replacement> Does size matter? You be the judge.

Source: wiktionary