All these, as I have before said, have one and the same immediate origin, the inserted marginale. But that marginale itself may be due to three sources; first, a mere editor’s quotation for reference; secondly, a various reading; and thirdly, a double text which, as I hold, in most cases has grown out of the various readings of antiquity systematised by rival schools. It is these last two classes of marginalia which naturally and necessarily occur most frequently when the text is originally in a corrupt state, and by their subsequent inclusion in the text render the confusion worse confounded.
Source: wiktionary
As the surrounding marginalia are all in violet and are from mh 10, it is reasonable to see in this an indication of the equivalence of th C to mh 10.[…]The marginale is opposite lines 1 and 2 in the right-hand margin.
Source: wiktionary
The Pendocks occur in the marginalia even more frequently than the Underhills; did the manuscript belong to them as well? It is harder to say. The marginale on ff. 39ᵛ, 40, in hand h, probably represents the authentic will of Robert, son of Robert de Pendock, who might well ordian to be buried at Redmarley d’Abitot, near Pendock; unfortunately, however, the entry, like all others which refer to the Pendock family, is in an Underhill hand.
Source: wiktionary
Insertion into the text of the marginale at line 20 (see app. crit.) would fit the first passage from Aeneas Silvius extremely well. There is, however, no way of ascertaining the exact relationship between marginalia, poet and copyist.
Source: wiktionary
Showing 4 of 8 available sentences.