Pynchonian

Academic feminists have for a decade worried that their “acceptance,” when, how, and to what extent it has occurred, is a form of repressive tolerance, a pretense on the part of departments of English that their enterprise could be smothered and subsumed under an expanded definition of “institutional criticism.” And though the rhetoric of Pynchon studies takes much the same line of argument, I suggest that the primary reasons for Pynchonians’ anxieties have less to do with repressive tolerance than with, for one thing, the idea of the academy as mausoleum and, for another, the nostalgia consequent upon the death of the author—a nostalgia complicated in Pynchon’s case by the nagging suspicion that it is we who have killed him.

Source: wiktionary

Largely dismissed by tenured Pynchonians when it was first published, Vineland now seems to have been underrated.

Source: wiktionary

Against the Day (2006), Cowart demonstrates in chapter 6, has been written against this condition, in an attempt to open up the one-language of national history to tenses and modalities, alternatives and not-yet-passed pasts that may still bode well for our common future. It is a future, in fact, that Pynchon has "actually"—"indicatively"—written into existence. For, stresses Cowart in the conclusion, the genealogist is also a visionary. What is more, the vision is shared by the Pynchonians following in his footsteps, many of whom are important authors already.

Source: wiktionary